logo
EverydayChaos
Everyday Chaos
Too Big to Know
Too Big to Know
Cluetrain 10th Anniversary edition
Cluetrain 10th Anniversary
Everything Is Miscellaneous
Everything Is Miscellaneous
Small Pieces cover
Small Pieces Loosely Joined
Cluetrain cover
Cluetrain Manifesto
My face
Speaker info
Who am I? (Blog Disclosure Form) Copy this link as RSS address Atom Feed

June 11, 2008

Simple sabotage

At the Enterprise 2.0 conference (which I didn’t attend), Don Burke and Sean Dennehey from the CIA gave a talk on Intellipedia, the CIA’s internal wikipedia. As part of their talk, they cited a manual, including, I’m told, this from page 28:

(1) Insist on doing everything through “channels.” Never permit short-cuts to be taken in order to expedite decisions.
(2) Make “speeches.” Talk as frequently as possible and at great length. Illustrate your “points” by long anecdotes and accounts of per­sonal experiences. Never hesitate to make a few appropriate “patriotic” comments.
(3) When possible, refer all matters to committees, for “further study and considera­tion.” Attempt to make the committees as large as possible — never less than five.
(4) Bring up irrelevant issues as frequently as possible.
(5) Haggle over precise wordings of com­munications, minutes, resolutions.
(6) Refer back to matters decided upon at the last meeting and attempt to re-open the question of the advisability of that decision.
(7) Advocate “caution.” Be “reasonable” and urge your fellow-conferees to be “reason­able” and avoid haste which might result in embarrassments or difficulties later on.
(8) Be worried about the propriety of any decision — raise the question of whether such action as is contemplated lies within the juris­ diction of the group or whether it might conflict with the policy of some higher echelon.

Their point was that these instructions come from a 1944 manual on how to sabotage a business.

The session’s Web page points to the entire, amazing, declassified manual of simple sabotage. [Tags: cia sabotage enterprise_2.0 intellipedia wikipedia ]

Tweet
Follow me

Categories: Uncategorized Tagged with: business • cia • everythingIsMiscellaneous • intellipedia • peace • sabotage • web 2.0 • wikipedia Date: June 11th, 2008 dw

33 Comments »

June 2, 2008

Global corporate village? Maybe not so much

John Yunker telling points out — and documents with screen captures — that global corporations often marked their Chinese home pages with signs of mourning for those lose in the recent earthquake, while their non-Chinese pages remained dressed in their business-as-usual designs. (He has some more screen captures here.)

[Tags: china earthquake globalism provincialism business ]

Tweet
Follow me

Categories: Uncategorized Tagged with: bridgeblog • business • china • culture • earthquake • globalism • peace • provincialism Date: June 2nd, 2008 dw

1 Comment »

May 24, 2008

A moment of Google silence

The China Vortex runs the search log for Google China that dramatically shows the three minutes of silence China observed on May 19th in remembrance of those who died in the earthquake. It is, eerily, like the inverse of a seismograph.

[Tags: china google earthquake ]

Tweet
Follow me

Categories: Uncategorized Tagged with: china • earthquake • everythingIsMiscellaneous • globalvoices • google • peace Date: May 24th, 2008 dw

Be the first to comment »

May 22, 2008

Israel is a low-down, stinkin’ appeaser

Israel is talking with Syria. And Israel is secretly talking with Hamas. So, why aren’t Senators McCain and Clinton denouncing Israel, for it’s obvious that talking with your enemies is precisely the same thing as appeasing them, surrendering to them, and rooting for them.

Isn’t it? [Tags: politics israel peace sarcasm]

Tweet
Follow me

Categories: Uncategorized Tagged with: israel • peace • politics • sarcasm Date: May 22nd, 2008 dw

4 Comments »

May 17, 2008

OMG, would you just please look it up in Wikipedia?

Here’s 9 minutes of Chris Matthews trying to get a hollerin’ right-wing radio host to acknowledge that he (the host) doesn’t know what “appeasement” means. Clearly, neither does President Bush.

The notion that it’s weak to talk with your enemies is even more dangerous than the Bush preemption policy. If you don’t talk, you use force. Force is expensive. Force kills innocents. Force kills Americans. Force is wildly ineffective. Force makes peace harder to bring about. That’s why force is a last resort. The problem is, Bush doesn’t have a first resort.

That’s why during the cold war, every president spoke with the Soviet leaders, even while the Soviets were a launch-code away from obliterating us with nuclear weapons. Of course you talk with your enemies. What are we, inarticulate Huns? Blood-raged animals? Implacable minions of death? Jeez!

Talking with your enemies doesn’t mean you incrementally give them what they want in the naive hope that they’ll stop with that. That would be, um, appeasement. But refusing to talk with your enemies is — I don’t know what other word to use — wickedness.

[Tags: peace appeasement obama politics ]

Tweet
Follow me

Categories: Uncategorized Tagged with: appeasement • obama • peace • politics Date: May 17th, 2008 dw

9 Comments »

May 8, 2008

Open vs. closed disasters

I’ve taken the title of Sharon Richardson’s post at JoiningDots because it’s so apt. She writes:

What’s weird from an information and context perspective is how remote this disaster feels, compared to other events such as the Tsunami, Hurrican Katrina and Sept 11th. (A similar effect happend with the earthquake in Pakistan.) Is that because Burma is such a closed society, meaning there are very few first-hand on-the-spot-as-it-happens pictures and videos? Research has proven that people connect more when shown a specific story rather than massive (no matter how scary) statistics. The tsunami also occured in a region with strict controls. Perhaps having a tourist spot complete with Westerners and their camcorders helped.

Maybe a more evolved consciousness would be unaffected by the particular stories and the particular videos, for rationally we know that the disaster is a disaster whether or not there happens to be film at 11. Or maybe our atavistic reaction to personal stories is a necessary part of our being moral creatures … so long as we still make the donation even when, in the absence of stories, only pure reason moves us .

[Tags: burma morality ]

Tweet
Follow me

Categories: Uncategorized Tagged with: burma • globalvoices • morality • peace Date: May 8th, 2008 dw

4 Comments »

May 7, 2008

Donate to Burma

Moveon.org is recommending that we donate to the International Burmese Monks Organization, which already has a network of local people in place. Moveon.org thinks that money donated to the monks via Avaaz.org is more likely to do good quickly there. Here’s a link.

We usually like to give to groups we’ve looked into pretty closely. But those groups — e.g., Oxfam — are frustrated that they are unable to help directly and quickly. So, for now we’re placing our philanthropic bet on Avaaz.

[Tags: burma ]

Tweet
Follow me

Categories: Uncategorized Tagged with: burma • globalvoices • peace Date: May 7th, 2008 dw

6 Comments »

March 26, 2008

The Vietnam Wall on line

TechCrunch has a good explanation of Footnote’s digitizing of the Vietnam Memorial, which is handy because the Footnote site is getting hammered with traffic right now, so the app is running slowly. The site lets you browse the Wall by multiple categories, and links together bunches of information. Sounds very cool.

The Vietnam Memorial wall is an argument for stone over information. But information is good, too.

[Tags: vietnam memorials ]

Tweet
Follow me

Categories: Uncategorized Tagged with: culture • memorials • peace • vietnam Date: March 26th, 2008 dw

7 Comments »

March 24, 2008

So what

Cheney headstone - by davidw

[Info: Think Progress] [Tags: democracy cheney iraq ]

Tweet
Follow me

Categories: Uncategorized Tagged with: cheney • democracy • iraq • peace • politics Date: March 24th, 2008 dw

2 Comments »

February 20, 2008

Quote of the day

I just caught up wth Harold Feld‘s Super Tuesday endorsement of Obama. In the course of explaining why Obama’s life story resonated with Harold, who comes from quite a different background, Harold posted the following quotation:

“The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone of the foundation. It is from the Lord, and it is wonderful in our sight!” (Psalms 118:22-23)

Wow, that Guy could write!

[Tags: harold_feld psalms ]

Tweet
Follow me

Categories: Uncategorized Tagged with: culture • harold_feld • peace • psalms Date: February 20th, 2008 dw

Be the first to comment »

« Previous Page | Next Page »


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
TL;DR: Share this post freely, but attribute it to me (name (David Weinberger) and link to it), and don't use it commercially without my permission.

Joho the Blog uses WordPress blogging software.
Thank you, WordPress!