Cheers for Sen. Dodd standing up manfully to Bill O’Reilly (= they yelled at each other), but he missed the point about O’Reilly’s complaint that DailyKos.com is full of hate. (Video) Dodd kept saying that O’Reilly was picking a few odious posts from over 500,000 visitors. It would have been more effective and more accurate to explain that DailyKos is a site where anyone can have a blog and say what they want. That the site is not centrally controlled is something that O’Reilly with his Big Media (and Big Bully) mindset seems to have trouble grasping. Dodd missed a chance to educate Poppa Bear.

---

Micah is live-blogging the YearlyKos over at the always-excellent TechPresident. [Tags: kos dailykos yearlykos chris_dodd bill_oreilly politics blogging]

Be the first to comment »

At my Everything Is Miscellaneous blog I post about the BBC’s Digital Media Initiative, an internal effort to enable the BBC to work digitally better, and make better use of its digital assets. [Tags: bbc metadata media everything_is_miscellaneous]

5 Comments »

The Washington Post has posted a provocative animated graphic that shows a social network with the nodes mapped to obesity. The narrated animation shows the clustering of the obese and the non-obese over time.

The animation comes from the New England Journal of Medicine, but the WaPo’s brief explanation of it seems to take a leap. They say it “demonstrates how social networks influence weight gain.” Well, the animation could just as easily be demonstrating that people cluster according to body mass index, but I haven’t read the NEJM article. [Tags: obesity social_networks washington_post nejm]

4 Comments »

The Wall Street Journal online has published an exchange between Andrew Keen (“The Cult of the Amateur”) and me. The full version is here. The condensed version is here. (I recommend the full version.) [Tags: andrew_keen web2.0 cult_of_the_amateur everything_is_miscellaneous ]

13 Comments »

Dan Gillmor has posted a terrific report on the past year in citizen media. Dan is a partisan, but is so innately fair and honest that this report from the front lines is invaluable. [Tags: citizen_media citizen_journalism dan_gillmor media journalism ]

3 Comments »

Jesse Lange totally schools Bill O’Reilly. I have to say it’s sort of fun watching O’Reilly dismiss Jesse as a “pinhead” as his only response to Jesse’s reading of the transcript O’Reilly was misquoting. But it’s more fun watching this articulate, put-together kid stand up to a bully.

(Thanks to Radar for the link.) [Tags: bill_oreilly jesse_lange ]

8 Comments »

The eighth and last in my series of Miscellaneous interviews, sponsored by the Berkman Center and Wired, is up. I talk with Richard Sambrook, head of the BBC World Service and blogger. We talk not so much about citizens as journalists as about citizens as those who exercise editorial judgment. How will the BBC compete in a world where we’re busily telling one another what we ought to read…especially as content gets pulled out of the sites themselves? [Tags: richard_sambrook bbc news journalism citizen_journalism everything_is_miscellaneous berkman wired]

3 Comments »

Last night at the Edelman/PR Week “New Media Academic Summit,” Gordon Crovitz, publisher of the Wall Street Journal, described how the Journal had rethought its role as a newspaper. Rather than trying to present the first view of news, the Journal assumes its readers got the news the day before on line. Instead, 80% of the articles aim at helping readers understand the news they already have.

During the Q&A I asked something like the following: Nicholas Lemann on the panel said that the NY Times was disappointed with the traffic at Times Select (i.e., its content behind the pay wall). That seems to suggest that there are plenty of people around who can help us understand, and we’re willing to switch. Further (I said), I can get more focused analysis on the Web. E.g., the mailing lists I’m on about Internet regulation issues gives me far more coverage and analysis than any newspaper devotes to the topic, and the mailing lists include people with great expertise; newspapers can’t compete with that.

Crovitz replied that WSJ.com subscriptions are doing really, really well. So, apparently people are indeed willing to pay for the quality of analysis they get from the Journal.

So, that’s a model that works for the WSJ, and I’m glad to hear it. But, I wonder if it’ll work more widely. After all, some very high percentage of those WSJ.com subscriptions are expensed.

[Disclosure: I am on retainer to Edelman PR.] [Tags: media newspapers journalism wsj ]

---

Speaking of which, Dan Gillmor (who I’m sitting next to right now) just had a great piece on the future of journalism published by the SF Chronicle.

Be the first to comment »

I’m at a company meeting at MeetUp.com and James Hong, founder of HotorNot is doing a speed history and demo. In his five minute talk, he makes three points of particular interest to me:

1. HotOrNot recently went from fee to free because, James says, because the Net is good at connecting people, and HotOrNot should not be putting money in the middle of that.

2. Your HotorNot photo can have keywords, AKA tags, which give people a quick sense of who you are. He says they took the tag idea from LiveJournal, before del.icio.us. But, he says, if you have too many tags, people won’t read them. So, HotorNot lets you put music, movies, etc. on yor hotlist. That says something about you. (If you see an item on someone else’s list that you want to add to yours, you just click the plus button.) You can also display these in some flashy widgets.

3. They added HotLists to Facebook, and hit 1M views per day in 4.5 days. Later, in his talk at the NY Tech Meetup, James said: “If I were starting from scratch today, I’d built on Facebook, not the Web.” Facebook wants to be the platform. “If they can pull it off, they’re the next Microsoft.”

Unsurprisingly, at the Tech Meetup, there’s huge interest in building on Facebook since not only is the market there, but the market is already clustered in social networks.

---

Robin Chase of GoLoco is giving a 15 minute demo at the same MeetUp meeting. (Robin was a co-founder of ZipCar, a success all the more impressive because it was so damn hard to start up.) It’s a terrific idea: Make it easy for people to share rides. She wants it to be more than just saving money on fuel: It should be more fun to ride together than alone. She recounts a trip she took a couple of weeks ago. She posted she was driving a ZipCar from an airport to a college and got an email from someone looking for a ride. It turns out that the guy was going to the same conference, and Robin knew two of his bosses. Otherwise, she might have turned him down. As it was, they they are now friends.

She talks about some of the partnerships they’re pursuing. I think the specifics are not bloggable, but some are not obvious and quite interesting.

She says “GoLoco” means you should go locally, go crazy, and go with low CO2. Clevah!

---

By the way, I’m glad to say that MeetUp.com is doing well, growing 10% per month. (Their only metric is how many successful meetups there are.) I love the Web, but I love faces more than screens. Also, I’m an admirer of MeetUp because it was founded to address a real social need. They are, well, good folk.

---

Now I’m at a NY technology meetup. Seven of us give five minute pitches, although I’ve been granted ten minutes to talk about my book. (Sanford Dickert did a great job liveblogging the event.)

Robin starts it off by giving the very short version of her demo. It’s even cooler the second time.

ExpoTV.com is about video product reviews done by users.E.g., if you search for “Fischer Price Swing,” you’ll find videos of users reviewing the swing. In this case the most played is about 2 mins long. The ExpoTV person (sorry, I’m missing everyone’s names) says you can tell that the person is a real mom, “not a sweaty old guy in a t-shirt.” You can leave comments. You can see more about the creator. The site sells nothing, but provides links to affiliated stores.

They attach “a tremendous amount of metadata” to the videos by pulling in product info based on UPCs. They syndicate their videos out to syndication partners, e.g., a channel on Yahoo Video and AOL Video. They also use the UPCs to match up with Buy.com. You can ask to see a video on a product by, say, a research-heavy user who has contributed more than 25 reviews. [It’s a great example of pulling together miscellaneous info, in part by using unique and meaningless IDs, and of profiting by becoming a meta-business.]

They have 100,000 videos and two VCs backing them.

Q: How will you screen out manufacturers pretending they’re authentic?
A: We have an advertiser tag since ads are sought by users. We hope our community will suss out the fake stories. And we require people to declare that they’re not affiliated [she said, rolling her eyes a bit].

Q: Multilingual?
A: We think it’s quite portable internationally.

[For products I want to see—not commodities—I definitely would check out this site.]

---

LiveLook.net has two products: 1. Show anytihng on your screen to anyone without downloading anything. Simpler than Webex. They charge $0.025/minute/user. 2) For online businesses, customer service reps can see your screen. That costs $50/agent/month.

They’re looking to raise capital and for tech partners

---

AdaptiveBlue.com works off a browser tool bar, bringing contextual relevancy to you as you’re browsing. It helps you “browse smarter.” E.g., if you’re on an Amazon page, AdaptiveBlue knows it’s a page about a CD and lets you browse for reviews, find other works by the singer or by CD, find photos on Flickr of the singer, create a station on Pandora.com, etc. On a movie page, the choices reflect its movie-ness. AdaptiveBlue cover about 20 categories. The menus personalize themselves based on your browsing history.

It’s Firefox only, but the “smartsLinks” menu adds relevant links inline. They make money through affiliate revenues.

---

Mogulus.com lets anyone launch their own own live, 24/7 video channel. It’s free. It is not video on demand. It’s linear. E.g., GroundReport.com, which is aiming to be the first user-created CNN. You can broadcast live or even drag in YouTubes (or from other sources), in case you’re not staffed up for 24/7 broadcasting. It’s all Flash based. The free version puts in an ad every ten minutes. They hope to have thousands of channels. “It’s all about empowering bloggers to take the next step.” It’s now in beta.

Founder Max Haot does an ultra cool demo. While he’s being broadcast live on GroundReport, he adds his name to the crawl, pulls in a YouTube, does some effects, etc. Ooohs and aaahs from the crowd.

Q: [me] How many channels do you have to have to consider it a success?
A: Thousands.

[Very very cool and it may find a market, but I suspect that market’s not going to consist of thousands of amateur 24/7 CNNs. Could it succeed if it instead got 100 channels? But if you’re willing to invest the labor in being on air that much, will Mogulus provide enough functionality? Or, will this be a platform for types of programming that don’t exist because they’re currently too hard. E.g., might a candidate set one up for use by her supporters? The Obama Channel? Or might people build channels consisting of nothing but YouTube playlists? I dunno, but it was a great freaking demo.]

[Tags: meetup meetup goloco hotornot mogulus adaptiveblue livelook expotv demos tech media cluetrain everything_is_miscellaneous ]

2 Comments »

Scott Rosenberg, co-founder of Salon and the author of Dreaming in Code, has posted at Salon an interview with me about Everything is Miscellaneous.

At his blog, Scott adds some “out-takes” from the interview, and recommends the book. [Tags: salon scott_rosenberg everything_is_miscellaneous folksonomy taxonomy tagging ]

5 Comments »