Co-Links

Hanan Cohen, on February 14th, 2005 at 1:57 pm Said:

Jakob Nielsen calls a single word with multiple links “fat links”.

http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20050103.html

Michael, on February 15th, 2005 at 2:02 pm Said:

It’ll probably catch on just enough for spammers and other parasites to have a field day.

Robert, on February 15th, 2005 at 5:21 pm Said:

Several of the links already contain references to porn and non-resolving URLs. In addition to delete, no-follow, and other future functions could work to keep this a useful and minimally polluted tool.

Vitor, on February 15th, 2005 at 6:30 pm Said:

What about search engine indexation of the links? It appears that all links open in an pop-up javascript layer, where they are requested from the databased and showed by xmlhttprequest. This is so complicated and absolutely inacessible. I think there’s no need for more than one link per word: if there’s this need, one possible solution is to generate an alternative page with the different links and their respective comments (making the links much more acessible and indexable).

joffaboy, on February 17th, 2005 at 5:12 pm Said:

Yeah my work’s net nanny software’s already banning this URL

blaz, on February 26th, 2005 at 3:13 pm Said:

Links Colaborativos

“Os links associativos funcionam como palavras clicÃ¡veis dentro dos hipertextos, conectando um determinado texto a informaÃ§Ãµes, dentro da mesma pÃ¡gina ou outras presentes em outros sites. […] os links permanecem fechados em si, de acordo com sua

andyx, on May 31st, 2005 at 2:40 pm Said:

hey This Co-Links links site isn’t functioning or am I missing something? , the idea sounds interesting but i would be nice if one could test it online.

If it does it’s job as they say it does then it is based in the same principle as the snipsnap or vice versa.
if somebody knows about a site using it i would like to know.

http://www.anfesoft.net
andyx