Joho the Blog » “A Plea for Excuses” online
EverydayChaos
Everyday Chaos
Too Big to Know
Too Big to Know
Cluetrain 10th Anniversary edition
Cluetrain 10th Anniversary
Everything Is Miscellaneous
Everything Is Miscellaneous
Small Pieces cover
Small Pieces Loosely Joined
Cluetrain cover
Cluetrain Manifesto
My face
Speaker info
Who am I? (Blog Disclosure Form) Copy this link as RSS address Atom Feed

“A Plea for Excuses” online

Steve Kruba has discovered an online version of John Austin’s classic essay, “A Plea for Excuses,” which I mentioned a few days ago. In it, Austin shows that our casual, ordinary use of excuse terms is actually quite precise and subtle…but when experts use those terms, they get all bollixed up.

This is where Austin asks us to consider the differences between:

a1 He clumsily trod on the snail.
a2 Clumsily he trod on the snail.
b1 He trod clumsily on the snail.
b2 He trod on the snail clumsily.

Previous: « || Next: »

2 Responses to ““A Plea for Excuses” online”

  1. a1 stumble
    a2 smoosh
    b1 smoosh
    b2 stumble

    That’s what I get out of the exercise.

  2. As the author notes, all the sentences can be interpreted the opposite way to his original analysis, depending on inflexion or commas:

    Footnote “14: As a matter of fact, most of these examples can be understood the other way, especially if we allow ourselves inflexions of the voice, or commas, or contexts. a2 might be a poetic inversion for b2: b1, perhaps with commas round the ‘clumsily’, might be used for a1: and so on. Still, the two senses are clearly enough distinguishable.”

    My favourite example of a sentence which can change dramatically with inflexion, commas and question marks is:

    (a) What would you with the King?
    and
    (b) What! Would you? With the King!!

Leave a Reply

Comments (RSS).  RSS icon