Joho the Blog » Terms we need to re-own
EverydayChaos
Everyday Chaos
Too Big to Know
Too Big to Know
Cluetrain 10th Anniversary edition
Cluetrain 10th Anniversary
Everything Is Miscellaneous
Everything Is Miscellaneous
Small Pieces cover
Small Pieces Loosely Joined
Cluetrain cover
Cluetrain Manifesto
My face
Speaker info
Who am I? (Blog Disclosure Form) Copy this link as RSS address Atom Feed

Terms we need to re-own

The election may not have been stolen — it’s more like it was beaten out of us with heavy clubs — but we’ve lost some key terms. We need to take them back. Or, if you prefer to be Lakoffian about it, we need to reframe them:

Morality. Already I’ve heard a radio journalist talk about the “morality moms.” You know what? We’re as moral as the people who claim to have voted for Bush for moral reasons. What they really mean is that they voted for Bush for fundamentalist religious reasons. Let’s call ’em “intolerant moms” instead. How do you like them apples?

War on terrorism. There are very very bad people who want to kill us, and we should kill as many of them as we can. But “war” conveys inappropriate ideas: That there is a stable, unified enemy. That the best way to fight is to use soldiers. That there can be a moment of victory and then peace. Bush uses “war” to justify the diminishment of liberty and economic sacrifice that we expect in real wars, as well as to hold out the false promise that we can someday be safe from bad people doing bad things to us.

Terrorist. A terrorist is someone who tries to achieve a political objective by engaging in heinous acts intended to terrify its victims. Osama is a terrorist. Most of the people fighting us in Iraq are not terrorists. If you don’t like Iraqi insurgents — and who does? — then get yourself a different term because you’re using “terrorist” simply to paper over the yawning lack of justification for launching this awful war.

Homeland. Can we please stop calling our country that? It’s a term that only exists within the war context. And I’m sick of its unsubtle resonance with the Fatherland.

Strength. When it comes to fighting terrorism, strength is overrated. You don’t out-strong terrorists. You out-smart them. When Bush talks about a strong America, he often really means an America that doesn’t listen to anyone else.

Sensitive. Cheney uses “sensitive” to mean “you’re a pussy.” In fact it means that you are occasionally influenced by reality. It can even mean that you recognize the inner lives of others. When you cease being sensitive, you are dead. Literally.

Resolute. Whenever Bush says “resolute,” substitute the word “stupid.” That’s what he means: Not adapting to changes in a complex world. Real resolution — continuing to a goal despite the personal cost and sacrifice — is a word worth keeping.

Civility. I’m all in favor of civility. Real civility. I am not in favor of it when it means “Shut up and assume the position.” When rights are being trampled (excuse me, I mean when we are trading off rights for increased security) and lives are being lost, keeping a civil tongue is treason against morality. (See first entry above.)

Democrat (adj.). Listen, schmucks, the adjectival form of “Democrat” is “Democratic,” as in “the Democratic representative from Colorado.” It is not “Democrat,” even though the Republicans prefer that you use that term so, God forbid, you don’t give anyone the impression that Democrats favor democracy. Either get this right or let’s start talking about the “Republic representative from Louisiana.”

Previous: « || Next: »

26 Responses to “Terms we need to re-own”

  1. “Homeland. Can we please stop calling our country that? It’s a term that only exists within the war context. And I’m sick of its unsubtle resonance with the Fatherland.”

    I’ve been saying this for the past 3 years now.

    From the moment “homeland” started to be bandied about, I have been continually reminded of that old Star Trek episode, “Patterns of Force”, and their references to “the fatherland”. haha.
    I just keep picturing that toughy blonde woman, speaking it so forcefully. hahaha!!

    Note: I started watching Star Trek before I was even old enough to have learned about WWII, despite having an uncle & father who served in the war – my uncle at Normandy, my father in the Pacific. So that episode was probably my first exposure to the “lingo” aspect in relation to Nazism & war. My father & uncle didn’t think it was appropriate to discuss the political or battle aspects of the war with a 5 year old. I was merely told Hitler was bad, the Japanese attacked Hawaii, there were terrible typhoons in the south pacific, and polonesian islands with whorehouses that didn’t have any walls. (Yes, I was also allowed to watch Monty Python with my father at age 5.)

Leave a Reply

Comments (RSS).  RSS icon