Centralizing the Servers
Craig Allen writes in an email:
This may be common knowledge, but I learned from a brief article in Doctor Dobb’s Journal (ya gotta pay on the web, I get the print edition free, how weird is that?) that way back when the Internet was being designed, AT&T somehow forced the design to rely on a relatively small number of central routers rather than a more distributed, decentralized approach. As a result, the net is more vulnerable to various kinds of Denial of Service attacks, various unplanned disasters, and (I’m not sure if this is an assumption on my part or the article said it) less throughput. AT&T’s reason was that otherwise it would be too competitive with the phone network (most of which they owned at the time).
(Craig notes that he’s summarizing from memory and thus may be off in some of the details.)
News to me. Sounds plausible. But everything sounds plausible to me.
Categories: Uncategorized dw
>Sounds plausible. But everything sounds plausible to me.
Especially these days…