Plagiarism and Copyright
Yet another public figure has had his reputation tarnished by plagiarism. The president of Hamilton College (Clinton, NY) has confessed that when greeting the incoming freshmen class, he used words first uttered by someone else. In this case, it was some phrases in a review of the book “Overnight Float.” The president apologized abjectly and then explained that in speeches he “only occasionally” uses the “systematic footnoting” required in scholarly works.
How absurd. As absurd as pillorying authors who didn’t alter phrases enough to meet some tastes but who cited the works in their footnotes.
I take it back. Asserting rights of possession over the wording of footnoted phrases — or of humiliating a college president because he didn’t put footnotes into a welcoming address — isn’t just absurd. It threatens to put up passport control points every ten feet in the landscape of ideas.
And doesn’t it seem obvious that this is being fueled by the rush to lock up intellectual property on the Net? We are able to exert such exquisite control over every phrase we utter digitally that the real world is looking intolerably sloppy. So we’re raising the stakes in the real world, and waving indignant fingers at people who demonstrably weren’t trying to get away with anything. If you want to see how the Internet is affecting expectations in the real world, look no further. Too bad in this case it’s the worst of the Net that’s having an effect.
Official notification and confession is hereby made that the following words (“WORDS”) were used in this public communication (“COMMUNICATION”) with the full awareness that WORDS may have been used in writings or other public expressions protected by copyright, trademark and Geneva conventions covering luggage. No representation is hereby made or implied that WORDS were the unique creation of the author of COMMUNICATION. The author of COMMUNICATION apologizes profusely for whatever pain s/he may have inflicted and hereby renounces without hesitation or scruple any claims, rights, injunctions or prohibitions on WORDS.
YET | ANOTHER | PUBLIC |
FIGURE | HAS | HAD |
HIS | REPUTATION | TARNISHED |
BY | PLAGIARISM | THE |
PRESIDENT | OF | HAMILTON |
COLLEGE | CLINTON | NY |
CONFESSED | THAT | WHEN |
GREETING | INCOMING | FRESHMEN |
CLASS | HE | USED |
WORDS | FIRST | UTTERED |
SOMEONE | ELSE | IN |
THIS | CASE | IT |
WAS | SOME | PHRASES |
A | REVIEW | BOOK |
OVERNIGHT | FLOAT | APOLOGIZED |
ABJECTLY | AND | THEN |
EXPLAINED | SPEECHES | ONLY |
OCCASIONALLY | USES | SYSTEMATIC |
FOOTNOTING | REQUIRED | SCHOLARLY |
WORKS | HOW | ABSURD |
AS | PILLORYING | AUTHORS |
WHO | DIDN’T | ALTER |
ENOUGH | TO | MEET |
TASTES | BUT | CITED |
THEIR | FOOTNOTES | I |
TAKE | BACK | ASSERTING |
RIGHTS | POSSESSION | OVER |
WORDING | FOOTNOTED | OR |
HUMILIATING | BECAUSE | PUT |
INTO | WELCOMING | ADDRESS |
ISN’T | JUST | THREATENS |
UP | PASSPORT | CONTROL |
POINTS | EVERY | TEN |
FEET | LANDSCAPE | IDEAS |
DOESN’T | SEEM | OBVIOUS |
IS | BEING | FUELED |
RUSH | LOCK | INTELLECTUAL |
PROPERTY | ON | NET |
WE | ARE | ABLE |
EXERT | SUCH | EXQUISITE |
PHRASE | UTTER | DIGITALLY |
REAL | WORLD | LOOKING |
INTOLERABLY | SLOPPY | SO |
WE’RE | RAISING | STAKES |
WAVING | INDIGNANT | FINGERS |
AT | PEOPLE | DEMONSTRABLY |
WEREN’T | TRYING | GET |
AWAY | WITH | ANYTHING |
IF | YOU | WANT |
SEE | INTERNET | AFFECTING |
EXPECTATIONS | LOOK | NO |
FURTHER | TOO | BAD |
IT’S | WORST | THAT’S |
HAVING | AN | EFFECT |
NOTE | FACTUAL | INFORMATION |
BLOG | ENTRY | COMES |
FROM | AP | REPORT |
BOSTON | GLOBE | SEPT |
25 | MAY | HAVE |
BEEN | STOLEN | LARRY |
LESSIG | SUE | ME |
BRING | BABY |
Categories: Uncategorized dw