Much as I love Wikipedia — and I love it so much that I’m giving it candy hearts on Valentine’s Day — its policy of neutrality sometimes forces resolution when we’d rather have debate. Yes, competing sides get represented in the articles, and the discussion pages let us hear people arguing their points, but the arguments themselves are treated as stations on the way to neutral agreement.

So, there’s room for additional approaches that take the arguments themselves as their topics. That’s what Debatepedia.org does, and it looks like it’s on its way to being really useful.

Like Wikipedia, anyone can edit existing content. Unlike Wikipedia, its topics are all up for debate. Each topic presents both sides, structured into sub-questions, with a strong ethos of citation, factuality, and lack of flaming; the first of its Guiding Principles is “No personal opinion.” Rather, it attempts to present the best case and best evidence for each side.

Debatepedia limits itself to topics with yes-no alternatives and with clear pro and con cases. To start a debate, a user has to propose it and the editors (who seem to be the people who founded it…I couldn’t find info about them on the site) have to accept it. This keeps people from proposing stupid topics and boosts the likelihood that if you visit a listed debate, you’ll find content there. It also limits discussion to topics that have two and only two sides, which may turn out to be a serious limitation. But, we’ll see. And it can adapt as required.

Will Debatepedia take off? Who the hell knows. But it’s a welcome addition to the range of experiments in pulling ourselves together. [Tags: politics wikis wikipedia debatepedia everything_is_miscellaneous ]

Be the first to comment »

Ok, so it’s not hypertext. But it is scrolling text on a guitar. (I’m waiting for BradSucks to write “While My Guitar Gently Blogs.” I’ve already tried to get him to write “The Taxonomy of Love.” Guaranteed megahit.) [Tags: bradsucks guitar diy]

1 Comment »

This past Tuesday, Henok Mehari, an intern at the Berkman Center, by way of rehearsal read us the speech he gave today to the graduating class at Notre Dame Education Center. I found it moving and asked for permission to blog it. Here it is:

[Tags: speech henok_mehari ethiopia hope america notre_dame_education_center ]

2 Comments »

Handelsblatt’s Mario Sixtus has posted a video interview with me we did at Le Web 3. I blather on about Cluetrainy stuff, plus how to explain Net neutrality to “Aunt Tilly.” And because there are German subtitles, you can have the illusion that you are now fluent in that language. [Tags: video net_neutrality cluetrain handelsblatt]

1 Comment »

Personal Democracy Forum has launched a terrific blog — techPresident.com — on how the presidential campaigns are using technology. For example, Joshua Levy blogs about Fred Stutzman’s post about my.barackobama.com, Obama’s “private-label social network.” Here’s a bit of what Fred says:

In reality, 2008 is going to be about the enmeshing of networks. Some of the action that goes on in the networks will be centrally maintained, but some (as in the example of the Facebook group) will be produced by people external to the campaign. Should candidates put their head in the sand and act like the external work doesn’t exist? Absolutely not. The simple reality is that by embracing social media, communities are going to play a significant role in the creation of the candidate. Like it or not, some of Obama’s online identity is going to be created by the Facebook group, over which he has no control. The millions of users who embrace Obama in one way or another will get their messages from a number of different sources, so central control is effectively impossible.

The TechPresident feed is going straight into my aggregator… [Tags: personaldemocracy democracy techpresident fred_stuzman obama politics everything_is_miscellaneous ]

Be the first to comment »

Lorcan Dempsey has a brilliant post on why Google’s moving from a SOAP API to Ajax syndication transforms it from an information landscape into an “information brandscape”™ Amazon, he points out, is happy to let other apps and sites use its product data because the data — a link to a book, a book cover — is by itself and ad. Google wants to get their actual ads into those other sites. Lorcan goes on to apply this distinction to library Web services.

(BTW, Lorcan, I slapped the trademark on to “information brandscape” so now it’s mine. Bwahaha!) [Tags: google libraries amazon lorcan_dempsey everything_is_miscellaneous web2.0 api soap ajax worldcat]

7 Comments »

Here’s a list of the interviews I did at the Fast Forward user conference, along with the little blurbs describing them. I’ve appended an occasional editorial comment. Most are around 5 minutes, although a few run considerably longer. (I’m writing this in an airport and will probably get things wrong. Darn that haste!)

Chris Anderson, editor-in-chief of Wired and author of The Long Tail talks about when taxonomies, text search and tagging works, and how this applies to a magazine site. And what about tagging’s own long tail? [Tagalicious!]

John Battelle, the author of the best book on Google, says that search should be a conversation with your customers. And it won’t occur only by typing into a text box.

Jeanette Borzo of the Economist Intelligence Unit talks about her survey of 400 executives that showed that even though they’re unclear about what Web 2.0 means, they’re planning on using it to increase revenues and drive down costs. [Quite amusing survey results.]

Matthew Brown, a senior analyst at Forrester Research, talks about the future in which search is ubiquitous but also frequently less visible.

Susan Feldman, an analyst with IDC, gives an advance peak at a study she’s going to be announcing tomorrow that upsets expectations about how people find sites…and opens a possibility for “long tail” advertising. [I think I forced a “clarification” on her that’s actually misleading. From talking with people afterwards, the two types of “queries” she’s talking about probably are ones made at search sites, and ones made using the search services of particular sites, e.g., searching for a book at Google or Amazon. I thought by the second type of query she meant people typing a URL directly into the address bar of a Web site. Sorry!]

Carl Frappaolo of the Delphi Group explains why we should think of search not in terms of finding so much as in terms of teaching.

Stephen Gallagher, Senior Director at Accenture, says that business intelligence is the main factor high performance companies have in common. Bottom-up, “messy” data (in Tim O’Reilly’s phrase) is only a “nice to have.”

Kathleen Gilroy, who’s also doing video blogs at the conference, answers her own question, “How has search changed her life?” If you want to know, just ask her husband.

Joyce Haas, search product manager at WebMD, talks about the use of social software in her company, the resistance to it, and the transformative effect it has. [WebMD’s willingness to let its employees talk this frankly says a lot about WebMD.]

Dorothea Herrey of Dow Jones Consumer Media Group, Director of Franchise Development and Partnership (a subsidiary of the Long Titles Divisional Department :) talks about how Dow Jones organizes itself in the multi-dimensional world of the Web, where the dimensions include content, brands, devices, markets, interests….

Bill Inmon of Inmon Data Systems says that at last we’re able to combine structured and unstructured search, so that (for example) a search for a customer will find transaction records in the database and emails the customer may have exchanged with customer support.

Dan Keldsen of the Delphi Group talks about the intersection of full text search and tagging.

John Markus Lervik, founder and CEO of Fast, talks about who is a bigger competitor, Oracle or Google [a question I totally stole from blogger Joe McKendrick], and the ways in which Fast internally is a Web 2.0 company…wikis and blogs, emerging bottom-up.

Lydia Loizides, a former VP of technology and emerging media at IPC.

Andrew McAfee, creator of the Enterprise 2.0, talks about what Knowledge Management 2.0 looks like…and whether it will arrive top-down, bottom-up or both.

Tom Mandel of ConnectBeam, a social software company, explains why tags are like poetry. [And the extent to which poetry and tagging are expressions of the individual. And why rhyming adds meaning.]

Jim McGee of the Huron Consulting Group, and DiamondHead founder, talks about the need for businesses to allow employees time to think, and the extent to which thinking can be done in the social public of blogs.

Tim O’Reilly, creator of the Web 2.0 meme, says that organizations have been slow to understand how “network effects” can benefit their business if applied internally as well as externally. As customers add to what the company knows, should that added-value information be made accessible outside of the company? [Tim emphasizes the need for internal sharing and notes that that sharing externally may not always make business sense.]

Hadley Reynolds, VP of Fast’s Center of Search Innovation, discusses the implications of the fact that in enabling sites to provide us with highly relevant results, we may trade-off some of our privacy.

James Robertson of Step Two Designs explains why “search sucks,” and how it can be kept simple and made more effective if the implementers do more work up front. [Plus, there’s the great Prawn vs. PrOn confusion…]

MIT’s Michael Schrage explains why getting highly relevant results from a search can actually inhibit the iterative process by which we discover and learn. [Is this the first use of the term “post-relevant results”?]

Euan Semple, formerly the knowledge management guru at the BBC and now an independent consultant, says that he thinks search is overrated. He trusts more the answers given to him by his social network. [Did the leave in the part where I find out that Euan, whom I’ve counted as a friend for years, pronounces his name “You-ann,” not “Eee-an”? How embarrassing!]

Sandeep Swadia, head of Search Business Consulting for Fast, talks about the intersection of customer needs for search and the evolving media business model.

David Watson, VP of Product Design and Development for Digital Media at Disney/ABC, talks about the role of user-generated metadata in guiding people toward his company’s content. Look for looser licensing of news content before creative content. [This is a Disney guy who understands that an importnat measure of control has slipped from producers to the audience.]

Zia Zaman, SVP of Strategic Marketing at Fast, talks about search as the visible surface of deep business processes, and what this means for Fast as a partner. [Tags: ff07 fastforward web2.0 videos interviews search everything_is_miscellaneous]

5 Comments »

Chris Daly has just started a blog for a book he’s been working on about the history of newspapers. I’ve read a big chunk of an early draft, which I enjoyed and learned a lot from. The first two chapters of the book are posted there, covering 1704-1832, in which you’ll hear how newspapers’ nonpartisanship came originally not from a high-minded commitment to truth but from a desire by printers to sell to people of every belief. (Thanks to Dan Bricklin for the link and for introducing me to Chris.) [Tags: chris_daly newspapers journalism ]

Be the first to comment »

The Chinese blogger Isaac Mao has a three-part proposal for Google to help it get right in China. In an open letter to Google’s founders he suggests: 1) Google set up a $1B venture fund to invest in leading edge companies in China. 2) “Develop anti-censorship tools and service for global Internet users.” 3) “Increase the incentive to Chinese Google Adsense users.”

When Google first announced that it would agree to censor certain search terms in China, I thought that it was a reasonable choice among only bad alternatives, given other steps Google took, such as hosting the Chinese service out of China so that the Chinese totalitarian government wouldn’t have access to its records. I wasn’t sure then, and I’m not more sure now, that Google made the right choice. Adopting Isaac’s proposals would help explain why Google being in China is overall a good thing. (Thanks to Rebecca MacKinnon for the link.) [Tags: china google search isaac_mao]

1 Comment »

I’ve spent the day doing video interviews with speakers and attendees at the Fast Search user conference. We did about 15, so I’m too tired to get the urls of all of them, but you can page through the blog and find ’em, if you want. Some great people talking about search, social software, knowledge management, Web 2.0, Enterprise 2.0, Two Dot Oh 2.0 …Some names you’ll recognize some companies you’ll recognize, and some really interesting people you may not know. (Disclosure: Fast is paying me to do this. But the interviews are not about Fast.) [Tags: video search km social_software ]

1 Comment »